[R32 GTR]

Not a bad time of 12.1 seconds with an ET of 121 MPH. only bad thing is its a BRZ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SG3bCfg0HCE

 

[Ade]

Yeah if it was a gt86 im sure it would have pulled at least 11sec!

Thats awsome, shame that setup probably ruins the wonderful throttle response.

My vote goes on NA tune, althoguh that may change

Edited by: GT86Owner

 

[R32 GTR]

you'll be hard pressed to get any more than 250 out of the NA engine which is why pretty much everyone has bypassed for turbo conversions. Value for money they are a better way to go than expensive cams etc.

 

[Stu]

.. I wonder how much the turbo legacy FA20 short-block is

 

[Ade]

you'll be hard pressed to get any more than 250 out of the NA engine which is why pretty much everyone has bypassed for turbo conversions. Value for money they are a better way to go than expensive cams etc.

I agree and I personally would be very happy with 250BHP.

I just think that if Toyota wanted the car to be turbo'ed they would have (especially as they are more efficient), but they didnt because of the turbo lag. After all the Porsche 911 GT3 RS is considered the best 911 and its not a turbo. In TOp gear they mentioned the throttle response when compared to the GT3 also. Would be a shame to spoil that.

Anyway, just my 2 pence.

I still will be interested in seeing a 400BHP beast even if it might not be my cup of tea.